Veda2.0 Released!


Investment-time dependent subsidy
#1
Hi,

Is there a way to model the level of subsidy based on the time of investment?
E.g.
Technology X
Commodity-flow Subsidy = 10% (in 2010)
Commodity-flow Subsidy = 20% (in 2020)

If X is built in 2010, then the subsidy for its lifetime is 10% ..OR..
If X is built in 2020, the subsidy for its lifetime is 20%.

Thanks
Lesh
Reply
#2

Yes, it is possible to define vintage-dependent subsidies on commodity flows, directly proportional to the flows of each vintage.

But you seem to be asking for subsidies that are proportional to some other costs (10%, 20%)?

You can model vintage-dependent subsidies proportional to flows by defining the technology vintaged.  You would just need to define a new commodity for such subsidies.

For example, define a new commodity with the name "SUBSIDY" of type ENV, and define FLO_EMIS(r,y,p,COM,SUBSIDY,ANNUAL) = X.  Finally, define FLO_SUB=1 on the SUBSIDY flow. This results in a subsidy level X for the flow COM and vintage y, for the lifetime of vintage y (it will be vintage-dependent).  You don't need to add the SUBSIDY commodity in the topology.

For non-vintaged technologies, it is not possible to define vintage-dependent subsidies on flows, only on the capacity.  Subsidies on the capacity can be defined by defining a NCAP_COM(r,y,p,SUBSIDY,OUT)=X and then putting a FLO_SUB=1 on the SUBSIDY flow. In that way you can always define a vintage-dependent subsidy proportional to the installed capacity of that vintage, for its lifetime.

Reply
#3
Thanks Antti,

I've done as you said, but the model still interpolates the subsidy over the lifetime of the vintage, as opposed to keeping the subsidy at the time of investment constant. see below.

TIMES-vintage.jpg

thanks
Reply
#4

Yes I can see it, but no, you have not done it as I suggested. 

You have specified a varying FLO_SUB on the SUBSIDY, and a constant FLO_EMIS=1.

Read my post again, and you should see that the basic idea is to specify a constant FLO_SUB=1, and a varying FLO_EMIS=X.

Reply
#5
Thanks for the help.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  time variant emission coefficient dgchoi 5 12,753 26-06-2023, 04:09 PM
Last Post: Antti-L
  SHARE-I/O for all process and all time horizon ejin 7 3,951 08-03-2023, 10:55 AM
Last Post: AKanudia
  Uptake of Solar under Solar subsidy xavier 2 3,146 22-04-2021, 04:36 PM
Last Post: xavier
  UC on (average) investment cost Sandro_Luh 11 13,387 17-06-2020, 07:38 PM
Last Post: Antti-L
  Problems to sync a small model with 8736 time-slices Pernille.S 21 37,574 28-05-2020, 12:01 AM
Last Post: AKanudia
  Time stepped algorithm -demand projection canismajoris 7 8,598 18-05-2020, 08:39 PM
Last Post: Antti-L
  Tips for reducing syncing time of SysSettings? Pernille.S 2 5,316 14-11-2019, 02:19 PM
Last Post: Pernille.S
  Very long sync time kogexo 10 16,105 30-10-2019, 07:57 PM
Last Post: kogexo
  auxiliary input of time commodity ignored Anita Prajapati 5 8,723 25-10-2019, 07:42 PM
Last Post: Anita Prajapati
  Synchronising takes too long time MohammedAbiAfthab 4 8,393 10-06-2019, 02:35 PM
Last Post: MohammedAbiAfthab

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)