Veda2.0 Released!


Issue in Demand Modelling for a specific sector and its results
#1
When modelling a specific sector, say Transport, we have put all efficiency, AFA, fuel inputs and cost parameters for multiple sub-modes of transportation. But despite this, certain modes are only coming and overpowering the results by making the model behave erratically. Specifically, cost_activity is coming lower and we are unable to understand where the potential issue might be in the demand inputs. What can be the potential solution for this ?
Reply
#2
Welcome to the Forum. I am not sure I understand the nature of the issue, but some reflections below.

> certain modes are only coming and overpowering the results by making the model behave erratically.

That sounds like you may be (freely) optimising the modal mix. If you are using a bottom-up energy system model like TIMES, such models are, in general, best suited for the analysis of the development of the technology mix serving each demand mode (over the full energy/supply chain), and the related impacts on e.g. energy and emissions balances. Therefore, many of these models simply employ exogenous projections for the modal demands, with own-price demand elasticities in policy scenarios. Impacts of modal shifts can be modelled by scenarios (each having different exogenous projections), but indeed they can also be modelled endogenously. However, endogenous modal shifting is a somewhat more delicate modelling issue, and requires careful consideration of the infrastructure costs, behavioural aspects such as intangible costs (e.g. travel time budgets), and/or substitution elasticities.

> Specifically, cost_activity is coming lower and we are unable to understand where the potential issue might be in the demand inputs.

Yes, if you are letting the model freely optimize the travel modes, something like that would be the likely outcome: cheapest cost modes would be winning the markets.

As indicated above, you can indeed model modal shifts also endogenously by incorporating intangible costs (e.g. travel time budgets), together with a careful Baseline calibration, or by using CES-like substitution elasticities in the policy scenarios. For the travel time budget approach, see e.g. the following ETSAP project report: Modal Choice in a TIMES Model.
[+] 2 users Like Antti-L's post
Reply
#3
Thank you for this. I will go through the project report and get back with any further doubts
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Issue regarding power curtailment [email protected] 2 260 26-03-2025, 06:59 PM
Last Post: [email protected]
  Issue inserting small values for RCAP_BND till 12 756 10-03-2025, 10:12 AM
Last Post: Ravinder
  Issue with UC on cum subsidies for period of years janis 17 2,632 24-02-2025, 10:03 PM
Last Post: janis
  CHP plant produces more than demand MarcoRP 2 419 21-11-2024, 06:28 PM
Last Post: MarcoRP
  Demand growth [email protected] 1 372 15-10-2024, 02:51 PM
Last Post: Antti-L
  Demand growth [email protected] 1 493 08-10-2024, 06:19 PM
Last Post: JGlynn
  Issue with Elastic Demand Hesam 10 1,240 04-10-2024, 03:15 PM
Last Post: Ravinder
  VEDA2 Results Tables Issues Antti-L 3 690 12-09-2024, 02:30 PM
Last Post: Antti-L
  Issue with Sync Log report LucasD 1 560 14-08-2024, 03:43 PM
Last Post: Ravinder
  Help with modelling CCS technologies for cement industry farzin 10 2,523 13-08-2024, 11:14 PM
Last Post: Antti-L

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)