Posts: 24
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2015
Hello,
i came for help before regarding constraints for flex fuel processes, but it looks like my flex fuel process itself is not working properly: it should either use one fuel or the other to produce the output commodity, but it uses both inputs simultaneously to do it, causing an overproduction of one of my fuels. I tried to use EFF and CEFF atributes, but none of those work.
Would anyone know how to model this correctly and/or which atribute to use?
Thanks.
Posts: 1,059
Threads: 42
Likes Received:
20 in 16 posts
Likes Given: 26
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
20
Please post a screen shot of the VFE browse screen such that all the parameters specified for this process are visible (along with commodity/commgrp indexes)
Posts: 24
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2015
Is it the screenshot you are asking for?
Posts: 24
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2015
Here is the technology carachterization:
TechName |
TechDesc |
Comm-IN |
Comm-OUT |
START |
INVCOST |
EFF |
CEFF |
FIXOM~2009 |
VAROM |
Life |
CAP2ACT |
\I:Technology
Name |
Technology Description |
Input Commodity |
Output Commodity |
Starting Year |
|
Efficiency |
Commodity Efficiency |
Fixed O&M Cost |
Variable O&M Cost |
Lifetime of Process |
Capacity to Activity Factor |
VEHICLE_ICE_FLEX_2010 |
New investment in internal
combustion engine flex-fuel vehicles: 2010-2020. |
|
|
2010 |
30000.0 |
|
|
0.348 |
0 |
15 |
1 |
|
|
BLENDED_GASOLINE |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
ETHANOL |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
PASS_PRIV_TRANS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sets |
TechName |
TechDesc |
Tact |
Tcap |
Tslvl |
PrimaryCG |
Vintage |
|
|
|
|
\I:
Process Set Membership |
Technology Name |
Technology Description |
Activity Unit |
Capacity Unit |
Timeslice Operational Level |
Operational Commodity Group |
Vintage Tracking |
|
|
|
|
PRE |
VEHICLE_ICE_FLEX_2010 |
New investment in internal
combustion engine flex-fuel vehicles |
MWyr |
MW |
ANNUAL |
|
NO |
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1,972
Threads: 26
Likes Received: 61 in 52 posts
Likes Given: 18
Joined: Jun 2010
From the table above it seems you are specifying EFF for both ETHANOL and BLENDED_GASOLINE. That will certainly not work: Only a single EFF can be defined for each process and period. If you want that the efficiency is 10 when using gasoline, and 14 when using ethanol, you can specify these two efficiencies with CEFF, provided that both commodities are of the same type (NRG). But if they are of different types, that will not work either, and then you should use FLO_EFF instead.
Posts: 24
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2015
Hi, thank you.
I have already tried using CEFF (exactly the same structure above, the only difference was 10 and 14 were declared in CEFF column, not in EFF) as well, but the problem remains. Looks like it does not "see" this commodity efficiency and produces the output commodity using both ETHANOL and BLENDED_GASOLINE at levels much above than the efficiency would allow...
Posts: 1,972
Threads: 26
Likes Received: 61 in 52 posts
Likes Given: 18
Joined: Jun 2010
Ok, the source for the problem remains unknown. As Amit suggested, posting a screen shot of the VFE browse screen (Basic
functions → Browse → TIMES View), such that all the parameters specified for this process are visible (along with commodity/commgrp indexes), might help diagnosing the problem.
You could also check the contents of the file QA_CHECK.LOG in the work folder under VEDA-FE (usually GAMS_WrkTIMES). Does that file contain any warnings related to the process or any of the commodities involved?