22-02-2018, 03:18 AM
Hi,
I have a world energy model working fairly well but I running into a problem in the Electricity sector. I of course have multiple technologies that can supply electricity (Coal, Gas, Wind, Solar, etc). I know I can use user constraints to limit the amount of each technology, and I can adjust the price (Capex, FIXOM, VAROM, AF and EFF) to get different technology mixes. The probably is that, for example, Wind and Solar are only slightly different and a very small change in the cost (e.g. CapEX) causes one or the other to dominate. Obviously, I would like both technologies to be used but I don't want to force a minimum or maximum. Is it possible to add a cost to the technology as it is added such that other technologies (higher price ones) become available within the period? I do change the prices on a 3-5 years basis but one technology always seems to win within a period. How can I force the model to use both (multiple) technology without just specifying the answer I want in a user constraint?
Thanks,
Donald
I have a world energy model working fairly well but I running into a problem in the Electricity sector. I of course have multiple technologies that can supply electricity (Coal, Gas, Wind, Solar, etc). I know I can use user constraints to limit the amount of each technology, and I can adjust the price (Capex, FIXOM, VAROM, AF and EFF) to get different technology mixes. The probably is that, for example, Wind and Solar are only slightly different and a very small change in the cost (e.g. CapEX) causes one or the other to dominate. Obviously, I would like both technologies to be used but I don't want to force a minimum or maximum. Is it possible to add a cost to the technology as it is added such that other technologies (higher price ones) become available within the period? I do change the prices on a 3-5 years basis but one technology always seems to win within a period. How can I force the model to use both (multiple) technology without just specifying the answer I want in a user constraint?
Thanks,
Donald