Posts: 1,060
Threads: 42
Likes Received:
20 in 16 posts
Likes Given: 26
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
20
Just to clarify, I expected people to use the Reports feature to work with parscen output. The report definition file has an elaborate mechanism to name and classify scenarios. If you are working with a combinatorial scenario design then even simple naming may not be enough. You may need to filter them by "scenario dimensions" - for example, scenarios that have low gas price and high RE cost assumptions.
Posts: 1,977
Threads: 26
Likes Received: 65 in 56 posts
Likes Given: 20
Joined: Jun 2010
Hmmm... but based on VictorG's post above, he seems to wish to be able to rename even the input data scenarios, not just the results cases (which is possible also working with the Results Module). Would the reports facility support also renaming the input data scenarios?
Posts: 1,060
Threads: 42
Likes Received:
20 in 16 posts
Likes Given: 26
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
20
25-02-2025, 11:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 25-02-2025, 11:36 PM by AKanudia.)
No, but I cannot imagine why one would want to do that. @VictorG, can you clarify?
Posts: 60
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 5
Joined: Apr 2022
(25-02-2025, 11:35 PM)AKanudia Wrote: No, but I cannot imagine why one would want to do that. @VictorG, can you clarify?
Numbers in case names are not very explicit. Having information on the scenario in the case name is convenient when you have a reasonable amount of cases (~50).
Posts: 1,060
Threads: 42
Likes Received:
20 in 16 posts
Likes Given: 26
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
20
No question about that. I thought the question was about the input data layers.
Have you tried the reporting feature of Veda2? If not, are you willing to try it now? I can create a starting point for the report definition file if you share your key processed output with me.
Posts: 60
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 5
Joined: Apr 2022
(26-02-2025, 01:29 PM)AKanudia Wrote: No question about that. I thought the question was about the input data layers.
Have you tried the reporting feature of Veda2? If not, are you willing to try it now? I can create a starting point for the report definition file if you share your key processed output with me.
Thanks for the help, I am also thinking about the "input data layers" like being able to use the browse tool on more explicit names.
I have never tried the report feature and I don't have access to it with my license.
Posts: 1,060
Threads: 42
Likes Received:
20 in 16 posts
Likes Given: 26
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
20
Can you give me an example of what you have in mind for the input data?
I can upgrade your license to ADVANCED for a couple of months if you want to try the reports feature.