Veda2.0 Released!


Inconsistent Definition across Scenarios
#1

Hi Amit

In Swiss TIMES, previously some commodities were declared both in BASE and NewTech files. However, I amalgamated all commodities to the BASE.

Just now I changed two commodities’ CTSLvl and synchronised, but the import report (from VBE4.3x) finds some inconsistency, as if I have declared twice. But I didn’t see declaration of any commodities in NewTech (neither any hidden rows/columns)?  What could it be? 

 

The following Commodities has Inconsistent Definition across Scenarios:

------------------------------------------------

Scenario ; Region ; Commodity ; CommodSet ; CommodUnit ; LimType ; Tslvl ; PeakTs ; CommodType

BASE ; CH ; GEO ; .NRG. ; PJ ; FX ; SEASON ;  ; NRG

NewTech_TSv4  ; CH ; GEO ; .NRG. ; PJ ; FX ;  ;  ; NRG

BASE ; CH ; WST ; .NRG. ; PJ ; FX ; Season ;  ; NRG

NewTech_TSv4  ; CH ; WST ; .NRG. ; PJ ; FX ;  ;  ; NRG a QC report telling, to

Reply
#2
This is actually a bug report, which will be fixed soon.
For now, you will be OK if you reimport the SubRES.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  CREATING AND IMPORTING NEW SCENARIOS xavier 6 9,458 10-03-2020, 04:59 PM
Last Post: xavier
  Process/Commodity Set Definition Shibo.liu 2 4,590 24-12-2019, 04:19 PM
Last Post: Shibo.liu
  Plant Capacities under Low and BAU Scenarios pkashyap 0 3,447 08-12-2012, 10:10 AM
Last Post: pkashyap
  UC Scenarios and Storage Kannan 23 51,724 01-04-2011, 04:05 AM
Last Post: Kannan
  start year with different period definition dvanre 7 14,622 16-09-2010, 03:45 AM
Last Post: Antti-L

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)