Veda2.0 Released!


A question about trade para defining
#1
I define trade para as shown in demo. But I found that if I define "TU_*" in Pset_PN, the data can be accepted by model. But if I define "TU_GASCRD_REG1_REG2_01", the data can not be found by model. What's the problem with my model? Thanks a lot!
Reply
#2

Can you post the scenario file?
Reply
#3
Okļ¼This is a very simple defining in my model. Here attached is the tradelink.

Reply
#4
Here is the defining of trade para.

Reply
#5
If I define para as shown below, it works.

Reply
#6
But if I define as below, the data can't be found.

Reply
#7

What you see in the Times Browse (F7) when you write "TU_*"?

Reply
#8
There is only a TU defined in my model so far as shown below
Reply
#9

Region1 name length is greater than 7, so you can see different process name in the browse.
If you write "TU_GASCRD_injiang_gansu_01" in PSET_PN, it will work.

Due to restrict process name length upto 32, we are generating process name like "TU_" + [Right 10 character of Commodity] + [Right 7 character of Reg1] + [Right 7 character of Reg2].


Reply
#10
It does work! Thanks a lot!Tongue
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)