Posts: 106
Threads: 34
Joined: Feb 2013
I define trade para as shown in demo. But I found that if I define "TU_*" in Pset_PN, the data can be accepted by model. But if I define "TU_GASCRD_REG1_REG2_01", the data can not be found by model. What's the problem with my model? Thanks a lot!
Posts: 146
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2010
Can you post the scenario file?
Posts: 106
Threads: 34
Joined: Feb 2013
Okļ¼This is a very simple defining in my model. Here attached is the tradelink.
Posts: 106
Threads: 34
Joined: Feb 2013
Here is the defining of trade para.
Posts: 106
Threads: 34
Joined: Feb 2013
If I define para as shown below, it works.
Posts: 106
Threads: 34
Joined: Feb 2013
But if I define as below, the data can't be found.
Posts: 146
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2010
What you see in the Times Browse (F7) when you write "TU_*"?
Posts: 106
Threads: 34
Joined: Feb 2013
There is only a TU defined in my model so far as shown below
Posts: 146
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2010
Region1 name length is greater than 7, so you can see different process name in the browse.
If you write "TU_GASCRD_injiang_gansu_01" in PSET_PN, it will work.
Due to restrict process name length upto 32, we are generating process name like "TU_" + [Right 10 character of Commodity] + [Right 7 character of Reg1] + [Right 7 character of Reg2].
Posts: 106
Threads: 34
Joined: Feb 2013
It does work! Thanks a lot!