Issue to access results module

[AClerjon]

Dear Veda community,

I am fairly new using Times and Veda, and I am now having problems to access results of an optimization, whereas it uses to work.

Now, when I open Veda, I get the following error window :
 
When opening the "results module", no simulation appears, even after clicking on "refreach data".

I made sure that C:\Veda\GAMS_WrkTIMES is no empty.

Do you know from where this issue could come from ?

Thank you very much for your help.

Best regards,
Arthur

[Ravinder]

Dear Arthur,

Could you please share the log file with us?

To find the latest log file, navigate to the Help menu and select the "Error Log" option to access the logs folder directly.

We can discuss this issue in a web meeting. Please let me know your availability. I am available between 10:00 AM and 7:00 PM IST(Indian Standard Time).

Regards,
Ravinder Singh Chauhan

[AClerjon]

Dear Veda community,
 
Following the help of Ravinder, I've managed to import properly the simulation of a collegue. To solve this issue, I simply had to import the .vd files one by one, not simultaneously. 
 
However, I am still facing an issue of a different kind: once a scenario is imported (ks~0004 for example here), I don’t get consisted results, as shown in the result table below.



The starting period of this multi-regional model is 2019. We observe that in 2019, in France, there are 64 GW on nuclear and 1.8GW of PV capacity installed, which is correct and corresponds to the imput. However, we see here that an additional 313 GW of solar PV are installed in 2019. Could you explain why this happens?

 
The strange thing is that my colleagues who ran the model or imported the results do not observe the same results.
 
Thank you very much for helping!
 
Best regards,
Arthur

[Antti-L]

> Following the help of Ravinder, I've managed to import properly the simulation of a collegue. To solve this issue, I simply had to import the .vd files one by one, not simultaneously.

This sounds worrying indeed.  Did @Ravinder in fact suggest that .vd files need to be imported one by one, not simultaneously, to avoid problems in importing results?  I think that would not be reasonable...     AClerjon: Can you elaborate on the nature of the problems you have with simultaneous import, or can Ravinder confirm that this is the solution he suggested?

[Ravinder]

> Following the help of Ravinder, I've managed to import properly the simulation of a collegue. To solve this issue, I simply had to import the .vd files one by one, not simultaneously.

This sounds worrying indeed.  Did @Ravinder in fact suggest that .vd files need to be imported one by one, not simultaneously, to avoid problems in importing results?  I think that would not be reasonable...     AClerjon: Can you elaborate on the nature of the problems you have with simultaneous import, or can Ravinder confirm that this is the solution he suggested?

Dear Antti,

@Arthur encountered errors when importing multiple runs of the same case (e.g., ks~0001_2405.vd, ks~0001_1305.vd, and ks~0001_2305.vd) within the same study (default is pilot_runs). It is strongly advised to import only one version of each case per study. To import different runs of the same case, use unique study names for each. For example, use the study name '2405' to import the ks~0001_2405 case, '1305' to import the ks~0001_1305 case, and '2305' to import the ks~0001_2305 case.

Please find the attached document for a detailed case study on @Arthur's error.

[Antti-L]

Ahh, that kind of an issue... thanks for the clarification.