COM_EMI and FLO_EMIS

[Antti-L]

Hmm...  I find it hard to believe that would be so, that you would actually get FLO_EMIS  for industry processes I* by using the mask EZ* ??  If so, it would be a very strange VEDA bug...

But to verify, could you post a picture showing all the FLO_EMIS parameters for ELCCO2N from Browse, with all dimensions expanded (Scenario name shown as well)?

Actually, could you first explain how you concluded that "this rule is also applied to industrial processes whereas they are named in the form of I* and generate INDCO2N? "

[AKanudia]

I agree with Antti, of course .

An easy and reliable way to locate the source of spurious entries is to double click one of those numbers in Browse.

[LucasD]

I came to this conclusion (a bit quickly I agree) by seeing the results from an industrial CCS process generating process heat (IPNMCCSNGA005). The picture attached shows the output INDCO2N of this process is negative, so I thought the emissions from INDNGA combustion was null and the negative value due only to the carbon sequestred by the process. As I activated this process just after I declared the FLO_EMIS table, I thought the negative value was due to this. But actually, a previous user of the model has removed the INDCO2N emitted from INDNGA combustion from a COMEMI table, and attributed the emission factor at the FuelTech level. That is why I have negative values for INDCO2N and it is certainly not due to the FLO_EMIS statement. I was not familiar with the Browse module but now I checked and I can confirm the FLO_EMIS statement is allocated to EZ* processes only.

So sorry for the disturbance and thanks again for the guidance!