Veda2.0 Released!


Model infeasible regardless of CO2 limit- not sure why?
#1
Hello,

I am working on a model that multiple people are collaborating on. Not sure what's causing this, but simply incorporating a CO2 bound causes the model to become integer infeasible. Not sure why. When I remove the CO2 scenario file from the case manager, the model works. But as soon as I incorporate the CO2 bound, regardless of how relaxed my CO2 upper limit is, I keep getting the integer infeasible error or the dummy import process IMPDEMZ kicks in (if enabled).

Could you please suggest what may be causing this?

Thank you.
Reply
#2
Following up on my previous question (please see attached model):

1. Some timeslices (SNN - summer night nowind - wind AFA=0, SNW - summer night wind - AFA !=0) have been created to introduce a notion of variability of wind. I have been told the goal was to get wind and natural gas to deploy in a 1:1 ratio. Instead this is causing no wind to be deployed. Could this be causing the model to be infeasible? Is there a better way to approach this?

2. 2013-16 power generation figures are setup as an initial condition with power generation figures from actual data. The idea is to force a certain energy mix and a certain amount of emissions which then have to be mitigated. I can see that the supply exceeds the demand TPSELC by a significant margin, but IMPDEMZ is still being triggered for these years. Why?

Thanks.


Attached Files
.zip   conv-nonuc-test.zip (Size: 896.58 KB / Downloads: 1)
Reply
#3
(10-12-2019, 01:07 AM)ach Wrote: 1. Some timeslices (SNN - summer night nowind - wind AFA=0, SNW - summer night wind - AFA !=0) have been created to introduce a notion of variability of wind.
1. I hope you are aware that NCAP_AFA (aka AFA in VEDA) defines an ANNUAL utilization factor. There is no timeslice index in NCAP_AFA. If you define AFA(UP)=0, the process cannot produce anything at any timeslice. If your purpose is to define timeslice-specific availabilities, please use the parameters for defining timeslice-specific availabilities: NCAP_AF, or NCAP_AFS.

2. I had a look at the attachment to see if I can help, but it included only VEDA templates, and not the model input files for TIMES (*.DD, *.RUN), nor the listing file (*.LST). So, looks like I cannot be of any help with that.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Model Import Yan Yan 8 2,442 30-01-2024, 05:45 PM
Last Post: Yan Yan
  Failure to reproduce a previous run from built model under Veda1.4 iris 1 2,183 19-05-2021, 09:23 PM
Last Post: Antti-L
  Problems to sync a small model with 8736 time-slices Pernille.S 21 37,575 28-05-2020, 12:01 AM
Last Post: AKanudia
  How can I model discharge times for two DAYNITE processes? ach 3 5,269 26-04-2020, 02:52 AM
Last Post: Antti-L
  Long run times w/ DSCINV, infeasible without ach 8 11,708 05-03-2020, 10:54 PM
Last Post: ach
  Infeasibility in Model Runs Ismail Kimuli 0 2,111 24-02-2020, 10:49 AM
Last Post: Ismail Kimuli
  Conceptual - why is UC_Growth limit LO not UP in Part IV? ach 1 3,756 11-12-2019, 02:35 PM
Last Post: Antti-L
  Understanding region emission cap in global model lppnog 4 8,565 15-02-2019, 07:49 PM
Last Post: lppnog
  Reproducing Model Run Errors O.Broad 14 25,153 10-01-2019, 05:45 PM
Last Post: AKanudia
  Demand projection in multi region model Lukas 6 11,975 15-11-2018, 03:55 PM
Last Post: Lukas

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)