Veda2.0 Released!


How to set UCs for the share of power generation capacity?
#16
(09-05-2017, 05:18 PM)Antti-L Wrote: Ok, thanks for your efforts in helping to investigate your problem.

Unfortunately, I was not able to identify any clear issue from the Browser screenshots.

However, I can demonstrate that the constraint is working by showing results from the DEMO model, using exactly the same way of defining the constraint as I have shown earlier.  The capacity results are show in the table below:


As you can see, the share of hydro capacity in the total electricity generation capacity is at the upper bounds defined by the constraint in all periods 2015-2050. The constraint is thus working fine. And I have verified the constraints also by checking the equation listing.

Therefore, if you still say that the constraint is not working for you, my conclusion is that there must be some (hidden) factor at play in your model, which is not visible in what you have shown thus far. Here are just two such possible factors:
  • An ~UC_Sets: T_SUC: (or some other UC_Sets tag) might have been left effective for the constraint

  • Some of the technologies included might inadvertently have zero capacity costs, making the constraint appear "ineffective".



Dear Antti,
I really appreciate all your help, and I think I have to spend more time on figuring out what is actually going wrong with the constraints in my model. Thank you so much!
Reply
#17
Hello Antti-L,
I've tried the method you told me to introduce User Constraints on the capacity share of specific power generation technology. And I think it works this time, however, one more question comes up. For example, I fix the share of hydro electricity generation at 15% for 2015-2050, whereas the share in results are around 12.5% for 2015, 2020, 205, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045 and 2050. Sorry for troubling you again and thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Xin WANG
Reply
#18
Browse the constraint in TIMES view. Most probably you will find some unexpected technologies in the denominator, which you should be able to handle by tightening the filters.
Reply
#19
(14-06-2017, 05:33 PM)AKanudia Wrote: Browse the constraint in TIMES view. Most probably you will find some unexpected technologies in the denominator, which you should be able to handle by tightening the filters.

Got it! Thank you, AKanudia~
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  how to define the capacity or stock for storage? guozhi1305 6 2,351 08-05-2024, 05:47 PM
Last Post: guozhi1305
  SHARE-I/O for all process and all time horizon ejin 7 4,028 08-03-2023, 10:55 AM
Last Post: AKanudia
  Using Share-I kushagra 2 2,020 12-10-2022, 03:02 PM
Last Post: kushagra
  About RNW capacity guozhi1305 4 3,079 19-05-2022, 08:13 AM
Last Post: guozhi1305
  Solar lower costs impact capacity constraints LucasD 10 9,603 18-12-2020, 03:04 PM
Last Post: AKanudia
  Storage output without capacity deployment ach 3 4,778 15-05-2020, 03:04 PM
Last Post: Antti-L
  Technology share guozhi1305 0 2,028 07-03-2020, 07:36 PM
Last Post: guozhi1305
  Too much installed capacity required Juliana_Barbosa 1 4,383 16-09-2018, 06:35 PM
Last Post: Antti-L
  UC Capacity Growth Constraint - Troubles at end of horizon Giulia Realmonte 20 35,844 19-04-2018, 02:13 PM
Last Post: Giulia Realmonte
  input share constraint saleh 9 16,097 14-12-2017, 12:57 AM
Last Post: saleh

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)