Download the latest version of VEDA-FE (45834) and VEDA-BE (492018)

Veda Application Installation guide


Inconsistent Definition across Scenarios
#1

Hi Amit

In Swiss TIMES, previously some commodities were declared both in BASE and NewTech files. However, I amalgamated all commodities to the BASE.

Just now I changed two commodities’ CTSLvl and synchronised, but the import report (from VBE4.3x) finds some inconsistency, as if I have declared twice. But I didn’t see declaration of any commodities in NewTech (neither any hidden rows/columns)?  What could it be? 

 

The following Commodities has Inconsistent Definition across Scenarios:

------------------------------------------------

Scenario ; Region ; Commodity ; CommodSet ; CommodUnit ; LimType ; Tslvl ; PeakTs ; CommodType

BASE ; CH ; GEO ; .NRG. ; PJ ; FX ; SEASON ;  ; NRG

NewTech_TSv4  ; CH ; GEO ; .NRG. ; PJ ; FX ;  ;  ; NRG

BASE ; CH ; WST ; .NRG. ; PJ ; FX ; Season ;  ; NRG

NewTech_TSv4  ; CH ; WST ; .NRG. ; PJ ; FX ;  ;  ; NRG a QC report telling, to

Reply
#2
This is actually a bug report, which will be fixed soon.
For now, you will be OK if you reimport the SubRES.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)