I noticed a new type of error « $198 » i never faced before…
I just have a small model with less than 10 technologies. I checked the .lst file but certainly I should have missed something because I could not find a solution to the error unfortunately. Do you have any idea please?
Here is the .lst file
Thanks in advance
11-06-2019, 06:29 PM (This post was last modified: 11-06-2019, 07:11 PM by Antti-L.)
The error 198 is: "Set used in 'ord' or lag is not ordered." and the set in question is COM_VAR.
The SET COM_VAR includes only the following elements: NET, PRD, COMNET, COMPRD.
This error tends to suggest that you may have used one of these labels as a timeslice name. Could you please confirm whether this is so or not? If not, then the error is quite strange; I don't know any other reason how this set would become un-ordered.
But let's first rule out the first possibility... maybe you could post the base_ts.dd and the BASE.run files to make sure?
[EDIT:] Ahh... probably you have chosen PRD as a timeslice name. Because "printemps" is spring in French, PRD might get chosen for "spring day" and so maybe it was not such a good idea to make that set ordered. What do you think, should PRD (and/or NET) be allowed as a timeslice name?