I can see there are both UC_R_EACH and UC_R_SUM in the DD file!
I tested it myself, and I can indeed see both generated by VEDA. This appears to be a bug in VEDA, and should be corrected.
This bug did not appear in earlier VEDA versions (a few years ago), and so it has been introduced in recent years.
However, I am not suggesting that it would be causing the infeasibility.
20-02-2018, 04:09 PM (This post was last modified: 20-02-2018, 04:09 PM by Antti-L.)
Amit: Why would that matter?
VEDA should never generate UC_R_EACH or UC_R_SUM unless the user has requested so, by using UC_SETS: R_E: <regions> or UC_SETS: R_S: <regions>
What you propose can be done. But just to be sure, what would happen in the case that Martin created by using RE with UC_RHS? I mean, if there is such inconsistency and VEDA stopped creating the UC_R_SUM entry that the user probably intended, would the behavior change? I think we started doing this because it is easy to make a mistake in RS/RE... the RHS attribute is more reliable.
Yes, of course it can be done, because earlier VEDA versions did not have this bug.
TIMES auto-generates UC_R_SUM if UC_RHS has been used (and UC_R_SUM has not been defined by the user), and so it works much better that way. The same applies to UC_R_EACH, and so VEDA should never generate either, unless the user has requested so.
I am trying to implement a cumulative net-emission cap between year 2020 and 2045, and thereafter don't allow any net emissions. But I don't get it to work.
Net-emission is defined as: "Domestic emissions" - "emissions removed by BECCS" - "emissions reduced abroad"